You are not logged in.
Just want to say thanks for solving the pain of gnome 3.
i tried it for 4 days, and it just slowed me down and annoyed the shit out of me.
Using xfce is fantastic, clean small and gives the performance boost i had some years ago!
using gnome 3 with
fedora 15
ati hd4670
12gb of ram
3.2ghz core i7
asus rampage extreme mb
fealt like some one was taking the piss, and sure enough they were!
they would learn a thing of 2 from compiz compositioning!
Last edited by success (2011-05-11 16:46:59)
Offline
12gb of ram wow, thats a lot. I only had 2gb.
Offline
12gb of ram wow, thats a lot. I only had 2gb.
yearra, thinking about upgrading to 24
when i'm doing web dev, testing on windows, macosx
or i'm doing c# development using visual studio ( - monodevelop )
or working with xcode on macosx
i've got 2/3 virtual machines going, and i'm already using about 10gb of ram
Last edited by success (2011-05-12 10:32:00)
Offline
That's amazing, success.
Anyway, I agree entirely with you regarding GNOME 3's "Shell". (I object even to the name. bash is a shell. zsh is a shell.)
Offline
That's amazing, success.
Anyway, I agree entirely with you regarding GNOME 3's "Shell". (I object even to the name. bash is a shell. zsh is a shell.)
shell?
drop the 's' i'd say
Offline
My mobo is maxed out at 1 GB and there's no way I could afford a new one. When I read about what was going to be in Gnome 3, I was appalled. Not only does it represent what I consider to be a Great Leap Backward, almost nothing I object to (or anything else, for that matter) is configurable. You either do everything the way the Gnome devs (who never listen to mere users, BTW) think you should be doing things or you don't use Gnome. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why both my desktop and my laptop now run XFCE, not Gnome.
Registered Linux user #470359
Permanently recovered BOFH
Any advice in this post is worth exactly what you paid for it.
Offline
[ Generated in 0.014 seconds, 8 queries executed - Memory usage: 533.54 KiB (Peak: 534.16 KiB) ]