Xfce Forum

Sub domains
 

You are not logged in.

#1 2020-07-23 21:07:05

tigerbeard
Member
Registered: 2019-01-12
Posts: 9

Exchanging Thunar

I wonder how deep is Thunar embedded into XFCE?
I installed nemo and set it as default FM, but I observed that some dialogs, e,g. inserted USBs are still served by Thunar. Is is possible to uninstall Thundar without destroying anything in XFCE? Is there anything to observe?

Offline

#2 2020-07-24 19:18:37

alcornoqui
Member
Registered: 2014-07-28
Posts: 832

Re: Exchanging Thunar

Not sure, see these different takes on the matter.

If I try to uninstall it, in Xubuntu 18.04, I get a warning of removal for the following packages:

thunar-archive-plugin
thunar-media-tags-plugin
thunar-volman
xfce4-places-plugin
xubuntu-core
xubuntu-desktop

My guess is everything would work nicely as long as I picked a default file manager in Preferred Applications.
preferred_applications_2.png

I'd wait until a more experienced fellow adds in!

Offline

#3 2020-07-25 08:19:40

tigerbeard
Member
Registered: 2019-01-12
Posts: 9

Re: Exchanging Thunar

Sorry, I did not mention that I had set the preferred applications to nemo. That works fine, but not all the time as I described. Another issue is that some "Save" and "Save as" dialogs seem to be Thunar based, because nemo features are missing.

Thanks for your linked paged. In one of the pages i found this:
>(Thunar cannot be uninstalled because of other dependant packages.) It seems that this behaviour for
> opening desktop links is hard-wired in XFCE 4.8.

The other link contained this
>it may uninstall a lot of other xfce things but can add another file manager and use that instead

That commenters do not give an explanation of links to what he says, but basiically thats what my question is about. Is there anything hardwired inside XFCE so thuniar could not be fully removed. Your warnings indicate that, especially the links to the "xubuntu-core" and "xubuntu-desktop" packages.

I thought the only place to expect a solid answer would be this forum. Maybe even with some backgroud info


Edit: one if the links talks about modifying the linked d-bus FM link. My impression is that this is just what the preferred application is doing. At least in my case nemo comes up when using the test posted in the third answer here

Last edited by tigerbeard (2020-07-25 09:02:42)

Offline

#4 2020-07-25 11:47:25

eriefisher
Member
From: ON, Canada
Registered: 2008-10-25
Posts: 528

Re: Exchanging Thunar

These "save as" and "save" dialogue are not Thunar. This is a GTK module. Another is "file selection". This would be the same on any GTK based system.

Go ahead and remove thunar. It does remove some other stuff, in my case xfce4-goodies, which is the meta package for the panel plugins but the plugins themselves stay.

In Alcoroqui's example, xubuntu-core and xubuntu-desktop are both meta packages as far as I know. Look at the package description, it may tell you. You don't mention what flavour of Linux your using or what version of xfce4 so specific assistance is difficult.


Siduction
Debian Sid
Xfce 4.18

Offline

#5 2020-07-25 21:37:14

tigerbeard
Member
Registered: 2019-01-12
Posts: 9

Re: Exchanging Thunar

eriefisher wrote:

In Alcoroqui's example, xubuntu-core and xubuntu-desktop are both meta packages as far as I know. Look at the package description, it may tell you. You don't mention what flavour of Linux your using or what version of xfce4 so specific assistance is difficult.

Hey I did not had the idea to look up Xubuntu-core in apt. So as long as there is nothing in XFCE "hardwired" with Thunar that should be ok. I check for a low use PC and give it a try, thanks.

Incidentially I am using Xubnutu18.04 with Xfce 4.12. But I did not give the details because I was after the general understanding.


eriefisher wrote:

These "save as" and "save" dialogue are not Thunar. This is a GTK module. Another is "file selection". This would be the same on any GTK based system.

So when I see weird behaviour in one of those dialogs (i.e. initial marking, highlighting and tab order), whom would I address in case of Xubuntu. Is it a XFCE thing, an Xubuntu thing or a Gnome thing?

Offline

#6 2020-07-26 18:10:03

alcornoqui
Member
Registered: 2014-07-28
Posts: 832

Re: Exchanging Thunar

tigerbeard wrote:

So when I see weird behaviour in one of those dialogs (i.e. initial marking, highlighting and tab order), whom would I address in case of Xubuntu. Is it a XFCE thing, an Xubuntu thing or a Gnome thing?

That would be GtkFileChooser (so, a Gnome thing). Depending on the program that invokes it, it can be the GTK+ 3 or the GTK+ 2 version. A real rabbit hole, you'd better be happy with the default behavior!

references:

https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable … ooser.html
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk2/stable … ooser.html

Offline

#7 2020-07-27 01:41:07

tigerbeard
Member
Registered: 2019-01-12
Posts: 9

Re: Exchanging Thunar

alcornoqui wrote:

That would be GtkFileChooser (so, a Gnome thing). Depending on the program that invokes it, it can be the GTK+ 3 or the GTK+ 2 version. A real rabbit hole, you'd better be happy with the default behavior!

OK, I once dived into GTK for fixing theme issues. I found it really hard to collect any information beyond pure class interfaces. So thanks for you proposal!

Offline

#8 2020-08-01 20:26:40

woistmeinauto
Member
Registered: 2020-03-29
Posts: 54

Re: Exchanging Thunar

Can you post content of your /home/user/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc

Offline

#9 2020-10-19 17:05:10

firstairbender
Member
From: Canada
Registered: 2020-08-28
Posts: 22

Re: Exchanging Thunar

You may want to check out this question on unix & linux stackexchange:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/question … lt-in-xfce

Thunar exposes a dbus service which is what most newer applications use (instead of mimetypes), to find a file manager for opening files and folders. Firefox especially uses dbus for this

Last edited by firstairbender (2020-10-19 17:28:40)

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.010 seconds, 8 queries executed - Memory usage: 552.59 KiB (Peak: 569.87 KiB) ]